Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2015; 7(1): 45-52
Published online Jan 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i1.45
Table 2 Published comparison studies
Ref.Li et al[47](2010)Li et al[46](2010)Zhu et al[45](2010)Cheng et al[44](2003)Cai et al[48](2013)
Compared methodsPD vs SEMS (20, 25, 30 mm)PD vs SEMS (30 mm)PD vs SEMS (30 mm)PD vs SEMS (permanent, temporary)BTI vs SEMS (25 mm)
Patients, n30/30/30/3080/7538/6360/8/6551/59
Technical success, %100/100/100/100100/100100100/100/100100/100
Initial remission, %100/100/100/100100/100100100/100/10094.1/100
Remission at maximum follow-up, %0/0/28.6/83.30/83.342.1/88.910/33.3/85.54.17/49.1
Major complications
Migration, nNA/8/4/2NA/4NA/2NA/0/0NA/4
Perforation, n0/0/0/00/00/00/0/00/0
Bleeding, n2/3/5/64/93/106/3/80/0
30-d mortality, n0/0/0/00/00/00/0/00/0