Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as an alternative to percutaneous drainage and surgical bypass

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 7, Issue 1

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

486

HTML

4837

Figures (1-3)

354

Tables (1-3)

192

Sum=5869

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1030

Download

1155

Sum=2185

Jan 16, 2015 (publication date) through Aug 1, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2015; 7(1): 37-44
Published online Jan 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i1.37

Table 2 Compare the two neo-tract creation methods

Neo-tract creation methods
Cauterization	Non-cauterization
Easy neo-tract creation with no need for forceful manipulation More tissue injury from thermal burn The procedure takes less time More complications, especially bile leakage or perforation	More difficult and forceful manipulation, especially when the intervening tissue is thick or the direction is inappropriate Less injury, smaller diameter of the neo-tract Lower risk of bile leakage or bleeding

Citation: Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as an alternative to percutaneous drainage and surgical bypass. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(1): 37-44
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i1/37.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i1.37