Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2015; 7(1): 13-36
Published online Jan 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i1.13
Table 3 Comparison of different diagnostic modalities in Crohn’s disease
Ref.CountryDesignNo. of patientsComparatorYield of CE, (%)Yield of Comparator, (%)Significant difference? (yes/no)CE superior? (yes/no)Other
Marmo et al[117]ItalyRCT31SB radiography (enteroclysis)7126YesYesTerminal ileum: yield 89% vs 37% Proximal SB: yield only 46% vs 13%
Chong et al[208]AustraliaBlinded prospective trial43SB enteroclysis PE77 7719 14Yes YesYes YesResults are in patients with a history of CD
Triester et al[81]United StatesMeta-analysis and Systematic review250SB barium radiography6323YesYesNNT = 3 to yield one additional diagnosis with CE
114Colonoscopy with ileoscopy6146YesYesNNT = 7 to yield one additional diagnosis with CE
93CT enterography/CT enteroclysis6930YesYes
84PE468YesYes
18MR enterography7250NoYes
Solem et al[118]United StatesBlinded prospective trial41CT enterography Colonoscopy with ileoscopy Small bowel follow-through83 83 8383 74 65No No NoNo Yes YesSpecificity of CE (53%) was significantly lower than the other tests
Pasha et al[95]United StatesMeta-analysis and Systematic review343DBE1816NoNo
Dionisio et al[115]United StatesMeta-analysis and Systematic review428SB barium radiography5216YesYes
236Colonoscopy with ileoscopy47 (71)125 (36)YesYesSuspected CD (Established CD)
119CT enterography68 (71)21 (39)YesYesSuspected CD (Established CD)
102PE669YesYesEstablished CD
123MR enterography55 (70)45 (79)NoYes (no)Suspected CD (Established CD)
Lu et al[116]ChinaRetrospective Study50Colonoscopy with ileoscopy9666YesYesCombination of two methods showed a higher yield, but no significant differences were reported between each two examinations
34CT enterography9685YesYes
39Small bowel follow-through9667YesYes