Evaluation of diagnostic cytology via endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage for pancreatic tumor

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 6, Issue 8

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

374

HTML

2579

Tables (1-6)

414

Sum=3367

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1104

Download

980

Sum=2084

Aug 16, 2014 (publication date) through Feb 15, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2014; 6(8): 366-372
Published online Aug 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i8.366

Table 6 Characteristics of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

	IPMN-CAN	IPMN-BEN	P value
Total	3	8
Main duct type	2	2	-
Branch duct type	1	6	-
Position
Ph, Pb, Pt	2, 0, 0	3, 1, 1	-
Pb + Pt	1	1
Ph + Pt		1
Ph + Pb + Pt		1
Size (range)	43 mm (32-75 mm)	17.5 mm (10-61 mm)	0.081¹
Mural nodule + (%)	3 (100%)	3 (33%)	0.1818²
Main pancreatic duct size (range)	6 mm (4-17 mm)	5 mm (3-15 mm)	0.5298¹

¹Mann-Whitney U test;

²χ² test. None of the differences between the two intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) groups were significant (P≥ 0.05).

Citation: Iwata T, Kitamura K, Yamamiya A, Ishii Y, Sato Y, Nomoto T, Ikegami A, Yoshida H. Evaluation of diagnostic cytology via endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage for pancreatic tumor. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(8): 366-372
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i8/366.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i8.366