Retrospective Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2014; 6(8): 359-365
Published online Aug 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i8.359
Table 1 Summary of results
Angioectasias (n = 39)Ulcers/erosions (n = 49)Villous edema/atrophy (n = 12)Overall (n = 100)
FICE 1
Improved delineation38/39 (97.4%)31/49 (63.3%)8/12 (66.7%)77/100 (77.0%)
Percentage of agreement, κ97.4%, κ = 0.91081.6%, κ = 0.71491.7%, κ = 0.81589.0%, κ = 0.833
FICE 2
Improved delineation38/39 (97.4%)28/49 (57.1%)8/12 (66.7%)74/100 (74.0%)
Percentage of agreement, κ89.7%, κ = 0.80279.6%, κ = 0.70391.7%, κ = 0.81585.0%, κ = 0.764
FICE 3
Improved delineation18/39 (46.2%)12/49 (24.5%)0/12 (0.0%)41/100 (41.0%)
Percentage of agreement, κ53.8%, κ = NA75.5%, κ = NA66.7%, κ = 0.30466.0%, κ = 0.486
BF
Improved delineation6/39 (15.4%)30/49 (61.2%)3/12 (25.0%)39/100 (39.0%)
Percentage of agreement, κ76.9%, κ = 0.55881.6%, κ = 0.57025.0%, κ = NA79.0%, κ = 0.593