Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2014; 6(5): 209-219
Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209
Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209
Figure 3 Forest plot.
A: Of risk of incomplete total mesorectal excision following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) vs open total mesorectal excision (OTME) for rectal cancer. Odds ratios are shown with 95%CIs; B: Of risk of risk of circumferential resection margin positivity following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Odds ratios are shown with 95%CIs; C: Of number of harvested lymph nodes following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Standardized mean differences are shown with 95%CIs; D: Of recurrence following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Odds ratios are shown with 95%CIs; E: Of length of stay following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Standardized mean differences are shown with 95%CIs; F: Of complications following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Odds ratios are shown with 95%CIs; G: Of all-cause mortality following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Odds ratios are shown with 95%CIs; H: Of anastomosis leak following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Odds ratios are shown with 95%CIs; I: Of surgical site infection following LTME vs OTME for rectal cancer. Odds ratios are shown with 95%CIs.
-
Citation: Sajid MS, Ahamd A, Miles WF, Baig MK. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic
vs open total mesorectal excision. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(5): 209-219 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i5/209.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209