Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2014; 6(5): 209-219
Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209
Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209
Ref. | Randomization | Power calculations | ITT | Blinding | Concealment |
Araujo et al[32] | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Baraga et al[33] | Computer generated | Yes | Yes | Yes | Sealed blinded envelops |
Gong et al[34] | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Guillou et al[35] | Random allocation with 2 to 1 ratio | Yes | Yes | Not reported | Allocation communicated by telephone |
Jayne et al[36] | Random allocation with 2 to 1 ratio | Yes | Yes | Not reported | Allocation communicated by telephone |
Kang et al[37] | Computer generated with block permutation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Allocation communicated by telephone |
Lujan et al[38] | Computer generated | Yes | Yes | Yes | Sealed blinded envelops |
Ng et al[39] | Computer generated random sequence | Yes | Yes | Yes | Concealed by theatre coordinator |
Ng et al[40] | Computer generated | Yes | Yes | Not reported | Not reported |
Ng et al[41] | Computer generated random sequence | Yes | Yes | Yes | Concealed by theatre coordinator |
Zhou et al[42] | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
-
Citation: Sajid MS, Ahamd A, Miles WF, Baig MK. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic
vs open total mesorectal excision. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(5): 209-219 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i5/209.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209