Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2014; 6(5): 156-167
Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.156
Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.156
1 Two or more patients at risk |
2 Medications and anesthesia usually used may be contraindicated due to fetal risks |
3 Patient position an issue in terms of placental blood flow |
4 Greater concerns for blood pressure fluctuations due to concerns about placental perfusion |
5 Greater concern for aspiration in later pregnancy |
6 Disease states that may be exacerbated by pregnancy (GERD) or specific to pregnancy (hyperemesis gravidarum, gestational diabetes, third trimester liver syndromes-HELLP syndrome, etc.) |
7 Deferral of procedure to more optimal times (e.g., defer procedure from second trimester to postpartum, with possible expedited delivery) |
8 Duration of procedure prime concern |
9 Obstetric input and monitoring usually necessary |
10 Screening for malignancy and Barrett’s esophagus less of a concern |
11 Avoidance of radiation-based and interventional ancillary procedures (computed tomography imaging, angiography) |
12 Monopolar electrocautery (e.g., with sphincterotomy) may harm fetus |
- Citation: Friedel D, Stavropoulos S, Iqbal S, Cappell MS. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in the pregnant woman. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(5): 156-167
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i5/156.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.156