Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2014; 6(4): 128-136
Published online Apr 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.128
Published online Apr 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.128
Table 3 Diagnostic performance of E.G. Scan™ compared to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy
| Prevalence % (95%CI) | Sensitivity % (95%CI) | Specificity % (95%CI) | PPV % (95%CI) | NPV % (95%CI) | Accuracy % (95%CI) | |
| Erosive GERD | 30.1 (21.5-40.6) | 44.8 (27-64) | 91 (80.9-96.3) | 68.4 (43.5-86.4) | 79.2 (68.2-87.3) | 77.1 (67.2-84.8) |
| Barrett’s esophagus | 12.5 (6.9-21.2) | 66.7 (35.4-88.7) | 95 (87.6-98.5) | 66.7 (35.4-88.7) | 95.2 (87.6-98.5) | 91.7 (83.8-96.1) |
| Esophageal varices | 21.8 (14.4-31.7) | 95.2 (74.1-99.8) | 97.3 (89.8-99.5) | 90.9 (69.3-98.4) | 98.6 (91.7-99.9) | 96.8 (90.5-99.1) |
| Hiatal Hernia | 34.4 (25.1-44.8) | 39.4 (23.4-57.7) | 88.9 (77.8-95) | 65 (41-83.7) | 73.7 (62.1-82.8) | 71.9 (61.6-80.3) |
- Citation: Aedo MR, Zavala-González M&, Meixueiro-Daza A, Remes-Troche JM. Accuracy of transnasal endoscopy with a disposable esophagoscope compared to conventional endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(4): 128-136
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i4/128.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.128