Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2014; 6(12): 571-583
Published online Dec 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i12.571
Published online Dec 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i12.571
Quality indicator | Potential intervention to improve performance | Strength of scientific evidence |
Bowel preparation | Split dose bowel preparation Last ingested dose of PEG-solution 3-5 h before colonoscopy | Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Observational, prospective studies |
Cecal intubation rate | Additional training and use of auxiliary endoscopic instruments (e.g., pediatric colonoscope) | Expert opinion |
Adenoma detection rate | Endoscopy nurse participation as a second observer Perform colonoscopy in the morning or in half-day blocks High definition colonoscopy (compared to standard video colonoscopy, marginal effect) Cap-assisted colonoscopy (marginal effect) Third-Eye Retroscope Full Spectrum Endoscopy | Randomized, multicenter studies Retrospective studies Meta-analysis Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Randomized, multicenter study Randomized, multicenter study |
Complication rate | Cold snaring of small, non-pedunculated polyps may prevent bleeding | Prospective, multicenter, observational study and small single center randomized controlled study |
Submucosal injection with saline and epinephrin prevents immediate bleeding | Randomized study | |
Prophylactic placement of a detachable snare around the stalk of a pedunculated polyp prevents bleeding | Randomized studies | |
Prophylactic closure of the polypectomy site with metallic clips after removal of large (> 2 cm) sessile or flat lesions may prevent bleeding | Retrospective study |
- Citation: Pullens HJ, Siersema PD. Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(12): 571-583
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i12/571.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i12.571