Diagnostic utility of small-caliber and conventional endoscopes for gastric cancer and analysis of endoscopic false-negative gastric cancers

doi:10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.440

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 9

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5235)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

380

HTML

2817

Figures (1-1)

190

Tables (1-5)

238

Sum=3625

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

947

Download

663

Sum=1610

Sep 16, 2013 (publication date) through Nov 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2013; 5(9): 440-445
Published online Sep 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.440

Table 3 Clinical characteristics of 17 patients of false negative-gastric cancer

Characteristics	Value
SC-E/C-E	4/13
Age (mean ± SD)	57.6 ± 9.4
Male/female	14/3
Duration¹ (mean ± SD)	14.6 ± 8.2 (M)
	(m: 13.2 ± 3.0, sm: 14.5 ± 2.5)
Depth of invasion	m: 9, sm: 6, mp: 0, unknown: 2
Macroscopical types	Elevated type: 5, depressed type: 12
Histopathological types	tub1: 8, tub2: 4, por/sig: 5
Treatment	Endoscopic (EMR, ESD): 6
	Surgical: 9
	Unknown: 2
The previous endoscopic findings	Undetected error: 3
	Incomplete visualization: 6
	Misdiagnosis as benign: 7
	No findings: 1

¹From the last time endoscopy to the day of cancer detected by endoscopy. SC-E: Small caliber-endoscope; C-E: Conventional-endoscope; m: Mucosal layer; sm: Submucosal layer; mp: Muscularis propria; tub1: Well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma; tub2: Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por: Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; sig: Signet ring cell carcinoma; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Citation: Kataoka H, Mizuno K, Hayashi N, Tanaka M, Nishiwaki H, Ebi M, Mizoshita T, Mori Y, Kubota E, Tanida S, Kamiya T, Joh T. Diagnostic utility of small-caliber and conventional endoscopes for gastric cancer and analysis of endoscopic false-negative gastric cancers. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(9): 440-445
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i9/440.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.440