Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 16, 2013; 5(6): 275-280
Published online Jun 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i6.275
Published online Jun 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i6.275
Table 2 Resection results of forceps precut endoscopic mucosal resection
| Endoscopist | Margin (min) | Dissection (min) | Total time (min) | Perforation (rate) | En-bloc(rate) |
| 1st | 9.6 ± 4.1 | 3.8 ± 2.4 | 19.1 ± 9.2 | 0/8 (0%) | 5/8 (62.5%) |
| 2nd | 8.4 ± 2.9 | 3.6 ± 1.7 | 18.0 ± 3.8 | 0/9 (0%) | 4/9 (44.4%) |
| 3rd | 5.6 ± 2.3 | 3.0 ± 2.1 | 12.6 ± 4.3 | 2/8 (25%) | 6/8 (75%) |
| Total | 7.9 ± 4.0 | 3.5 ± 2.0 | 16.6 ± 6.6 | 2/25 (8.0%) | 15/25 (60.0%) |
- Citation: Jung Y, Kato M, Lee J, Gromski MA, Chuttani R, Matthes K. Effectiveness of circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection with a novel tissue-anchoring device. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(6): 275-280
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i6/275.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i6.275