Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2013; 5(4): 191-196
Published online Apr 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i4.191
Published online Apr 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i4.191
Figure 2 Case 25 of submucosal tumor with an extraluminal growth pattern in which mucosal incision assisted biopsy was non-diagnostic.
A: No submucosal tumor (SMT)-like lesion was initially detected; B: Later during the procedure, the SMT-like lesion was detectable; C: Conventional endoscopic ultrasonography showed that the lesion was located in the 4th layer (muscularis propria) and had an extraluminal growth pattern; D, E: Due to the risk of perforation, the lesion could not be clearly exposed. The lesion appeared to be covered with the normal smooth muscle of the muscularis propria; F: Closure of the mucosal incision with endoclips. Pathological examination of the biopsy samples suggested gastrointestinal stromal tumor, but was not conclusive.
- Citation: Ihara E, Matsuzaka H, Honda K, Hata Y, Sumida Y, Akiho H, Misawa T, Toyoshima S, Chijiiwa Y, Nakamura K, Takayanagi R. Mucosal-incision assisted biopsy for suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(4): 191-196
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i4/191.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i4.191