Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2013; 5(3): 81-88
Published online Mar 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i3.81
Published online Mar 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i3.81
Table 4 Review of recently published data on an endoscopic approach through the minor papilla
Ref. | No. of patients | Disease | Divisum | Cannulation method | Cannulation success | Intervention | Improvement | PEP |
Borak et al[2] | 113 | RAP | 100% | NA | NA | EMP + EPS | 62% | 10.60% |
Maple et al[3] | 64 | RAP | 100% | Endoscopists’ preference | 85 | EMP + EPS | NA | 14% |
Chacko et al[4] | 57 | RAP/CP | 100% | Tapered catheter and guidewire | 86 | EMP + EPS | 58% | 10.70% |
Attwell et al[5] | 184 | CP | 100% | Tapered catheter | NA | EMP + EPS | 72% | 6.50% |
Song et al[9] | 11 | CP | 0% | Rendezvous technique or CC | 91 | EMP + ENPD, ESWL | 91% | 0% |
Heyries et al[6] | 24 | RAP | 100% | Tapered catheter and guidewire | NA | EMP 8, EMP + EPS 16 | 92% | 12.50% |
Maple et al[11] | 25 | RAP | 88% | Physician-controlled WGC | 96 | EMP + EPS | NA | 12% |
Gerke et al[15] | 53 | RAP | 100% | NA | NA | EMP | 60.40% | 11.20% |
Ertan et al[16] | 25 | RAP | 100% | Tapered catheter and guidewire | 74 | Dilation | 76% | 0% |
Boerma et al[17] | 16 | CP | 100% | NA | NA | EPS with/without EMP | 69% | 6.30% |
This study | 34 | RAP/CP | 45% | WGC or CC | 80 | EMP + EPS | 83% | 4.50% |
- Citation: Fujimori N, Igarashi H, Asou A, Kawabe K, Lee L, Oono T, Nakamura T, Niina Y, Hijioka M, Uchida M, Kotoh K, Nakamura K, Ito T, Takayanagi R. Endoscopic approach through the minor papilla for the management of pancreatic diseases. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(3): 81-88
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i3/81.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i3.81