Minireviews
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2013; 5(11): 540-550
Published online Nov 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i11.540
Table 2 Comparison of various imaging modalities
Imaging modalityPTCERCPMRCPUS/HFUS/EUS/IDUSCTOCT
Projection/ tomographProjectionProjectionProjection or tomographicTomographicTomographicProjection or tomographic
Resolution1-2 mm1-2 mmFairly poor 3-5 mmUS/EUS 100-250 μmHFUS/IDUS 50-100 μm300-500 μmμCT: 3-125 μmFairly high1-10 μm
Imaging depth1-5 mm5-60 mmEntire biliary treeUS/EUS: 5-10 cmHFUS/IDUS: 1-3 cmEntire biliary tree1-3 mm
Tissue sampling+ ++ + +-US +EUS + + ++-
Portability-+-US + + +EUS + +-+ +
Therapy+ + ++ + +-US -EUS +-+
System cost+ ++ + + ++ + +US - EUS + ++ ++ +
Operator dependenceHighHighLowVery highLowLow
Staging of malignancy--+ +US +EUS + + ++ + +-
Safety-++ + ++ ++ ++++
Experiment duration2-4 h30-120 min10-30 min20-40 min15-30 s5-10 min
Complications+ + +Risk (5%-10%) of Infection, bleeding and bile leaks+ +Risk (< 5%) Bleeding, perforationpancreatitis cholangitis-Claustrophobia in some patients+Risk (1%) of failure rate, bleeding and perforation-Rare allergic reaction (< 1%) to iodinated agents-No complication
Comments pros+ Diagnosis and therapeutic (treatment) procedure+ Diagnosis and treatment procedureNon-invasive+ No ionizing radiation+ Relatively operator -independentUsually non-invasive (sedation)+ Diagnosis tool combined with tissue and/or lesion samplingNon-invasive+ Faster method+ High resolution+ Operator-independentNon-invasive+ No ionizing radiation+ High resolution+ Faster method+ Operator-independent
ConsInvasive ionizing radiationOperator- dependentInvasiveIonizing radiationOperator dependentExpensive-poor resolutionSolely diagnostic methodMotion sensitiveclaustrophobiaOperator dependentHighly motion sensitiveThermal effects and cavitationsIonizing radiationSolely diagnostic methodLow imaging depth 3 mmMotion sensitive