Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors?

doi:10.4253/wjge.v5.i10.487

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 10

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (10587)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

531

HTML

7159

Figures (1-5)

695

Sum=8385

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1113

Download

1089

Sum=2202

Oct 16, 2013 (publication date) through Jan 18, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (25)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2013; 5(10): 487-494
Published online Oct 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i10.487

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Endoscopic submucosal resection with ligating device. A: Aspiration of a carcinoid tumor into the ligating device; B: Deployed elastic band; C: Snare resection performed below the band; D: A clear, post-endoscopic submucosal resection with ligating device ulcer.

Citation: Choi HH, Kim JS, Cheung DY, Cho YS. Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(10): 487-494
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i10/487.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i10.487