Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2012; 4(2): 45-49
Published online Feb 16, 2012. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i2.45
Published online Feb 16, 2012. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i2.45
Table 2 Outcomes and complications of this percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy replacement method
| Successful procedure | 221 (100%) |
| Propofol dose (mg) (mean ± SD)(range) | 34 ± 11 (20-60) |
| Mean procedure time (range)(min) | 5.9 (3-8) |
| EGD findings newly recognized (%) | |
| Reflux esophagitis | 12 (5.4) |
| Gastric ulcer | 5 (2.3) |
| Gastric neoplasm | 2 (0.9) |
| Duodenal ulcer | 1 (0.5) |
| Type of new catheters chosen | |
| Bumper-tube-type | 112 |
| Bumper-button-type | 109 |
| Oxygen administered | 8 (3.6%) |
| Mask ventilation required | 0 |
| Heart rate < 50 beats/min | 0 |
| Blood pressure < 70 mmHg | 0 |
| Discharge within 45 min after the procedure | 221 (100%) |
| Complications within 72 h of the procedure | |
| Aspiration pneumonia | 0 |
| Bleeding | 0 |
| Perforation | 0 |
| Peritonitis | 0 |
- Citation: Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N. Effectiveness of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy replacement using esophagogastroduodenoscopy and propofol sedation. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 4(2): 45-49
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v4/i2/45.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v4.i2.45