Minireviews
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2012; 4(10): 462-471
Published online Oct 16, 2012. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i10.462
Table 1 Comparison of endocytoscopy and confocal endomicroscopy
ECSCEM
Available systems
Probe basedOlympus (Japan)Optiscan (Australia) endomicroscope integrated into Pentax (Japan) endoscope
IntegratedOlympus (Japan)Cellvizio, Mauna Kea Technologies (France)
Max resolutionNA1024 × 1024 pixels with integrated system (lower with probe based system)
Max magnification1400 × (probe) 580 × (integrated)1000 ×
Field of view300 μm × 300 μm (450 x magnification)475 μm × 475 μm
120 μm × 120 μm (1125 x magnification)
Depth of imagingSuperficial mucosal layer onlyProbe based: Different probes allow for different imaging depths
Integrated system: Variable, up to 250 μm below surface (lamina propria)
Contrast agents0.5%-1% methylene blueFluorescein sodium
0.25% toluidine blueAcriflavine
Commercially available?NoYes
AdvantagesHigher magnification than CEMCan visualize subsurface structures up to 250 μm
Commercially available
DisadvantagesCannot visualize subsurface structuresLower magnification than ECS
Requires mucolytic preparation of tissueTwo contrast agents required for optimal imaging
Not commercially available