Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2010; 2(1): 36-40
Published online Jan 16, 2010. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i1.36
Published online Jan 16, 2010. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i1.36
Stage | Finding |
A1 (active stage 1) | Ulcer that contains mucus coating, with marginal elevation because of edema |
A2 (active stage 2) | Mucus-coated ulcer with discrete margin and less edema than active stage 1 |
H1 (healing stage 1) | Unhealed ulcer covered by regenerating epithelium < 50%, with or without converging folds |
H2 (healing stage 2) | Ulcer with a mucosal break but almost covered with regenerating epithelium |
S1 (scar stage 1) | Red scar with rough epithelialization without mucosal break |
S2 (scar stage 2) | White scar with complete re-epithelialization |
-
Citation: Ohya TR, Endo H, Kawagoe K, Yanagawa T, Hanawa K, Ohata K, Asayama M, Hisatomi K, Teratani T, Gunji T, Sato H, Matsuhashi N. A prospective randomized trial of lafutidine
vs rabeprazole on post-ESD gastric ulcers. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2(1): 36-40 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v2/i1/36.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v2.i1.36