Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2025; 17(4): 101998
Published online Apr 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i4.101998
Table 7 Randomized clinical trials comparing fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic tumors
Ref.
FNA (n)
FNB (n)
ROSE
Randomization
Technique of sampling
Sensitivity for malignancy (95%CI)-FNA
Sensitivity for malignancy (95%CI)-FNB
P value
Accuracy malignancy (95%CI)-FNA
Accuracy malignancy (95%CI)-FNB
P value
Bang et al[14]22-gauge (28)Reverse bevel (28)YesSequence of the needleCapillarity and dry suction10083.30.26
Bang et al[15]22-gauge (46)Franseen 22-gauge (46)YesSequence of the needle82.697.80.03
Noh et al[16]22-gauge (30)Reverse bevel 22-gauge (30)YesSequence of the needleDry suction9593.30.564
Vanbiervliet et al[17]22-gauge (39)Reverse bevel 22-gauge (41)YesFirst needle FNADry suction92.5900.68
Mavrogenis et al[18]22-gauge (19)Reverse bevel 25-gauge (19)NoSequence of the needleCapillarity and dry suction89.5 (66.82-98.39)89.5 (66.82-98.39)84.8 (67.3-94.2)84.8 (67.3-94.2)
Kovacevic et al[19]22-gauge (33)22-gauge (31)NoSequence of the needleCapillarity65.5%89.7%> 0.569.7 (51.3-84.4)90.3 (74.2-98%)
Our study22-gauge (50)Franseen 22-gauge (50)NoSequence of the needleCapillarity and dry suction0.83 (0.69-0.92)0.91 (0.80-0.98)0.84 (0.71-0.93)0.92 (0.81-0.98)