Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2025; 17(3): 104315
Published online Mar 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i3.104315
Published online Mar 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i3.104315
Table 1 Patient and lesion characteristics
Characteristics | Phase 1 before learning (n = 5) | Phase 2 after learning (n = 5) | P value (before learning vs after learning) |
Patient characteristics | |||
Sex, male, n (%) | 4 (80.0) | 4 (80.0) | 1.000 |
Age, (years), mean ± SD | 71.3 ± 5.2 | 65.4 ± 14.0 | 0.324 |
Use of anticoagulant agents, n (%) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 1.000 |
Lesion characteristics | |||
Tumor size (mm), mean ± SD | 9.4 ± 3.8 | 9.4 ± 3.7 | 0.990 |
Tumor location, U:M:L | 0:1:4 | 0:3:2 | 0.372 |
Pathology, pT1a: pT1b | 5:0 | 5:0 | 0.182 |
- Citation: Tonishi T, Ishibashi F, Okusa K, Mochida K, Suzuki S. Effects of a training system that tracks the operator’s gaze pattern during endoscopic submucosal dissection on hemostasis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(3): 104315
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i3/104315.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i3.104315