Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2025; 17(1): 102010
Published online Jan 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i1.102010
Table 2 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures in patients with choledocholithiasis in the case and control groups, n (%)

Case group (n = 44)
Control group (n = 44)
P value
Successful intubation41 (93.2)41 (93.2)1.000
Stone removal29 (65.9)36 (81.8)0.118
Incomplete stone removal12 (27.3)5 (11.4)0.092
General anaesthesia4 (9.1)0 (0)0.125
Laryngeal surface anaesthesia40 (90.9)44 (100)0.125
Sphincter of Oddi preincision7 (15.9)6 (13.6)1.000
Previous EST7 (15.9)11 (25)0.424
Intraoperative EST31 (70.5)28 (63.6)0.629
EPBD27 (61.4)8 (18.2)< 0.001
Mesh basket lithotripsy18 (40.9)19 (43.2)1.000
Mechanical lithotripsy28 (63.6)26 (59.1)0.832
ENBD38 (86.4)34 (77.3)0.424
ERBD3 (6.8)2 (4.5)1.000
The average times of ERCP procedures required for stone removal11.5 (1, 2)2 (1, 3)0.204
One ERCP for stone removal16 (36.4)16 (36.4)1.000
Two ERCPs for stone removal11 (25)15 (34.1)0.503
Three ERCPs for stone removal3 (6.8)5 (11.4)0.688
Number of days in hospital115 (11.25, 23.75)14.5 (9.25, 20.75)0.815