Letter to the Editor
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2025; 17(1): 100298
Published online Jan 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i1.100298
Table 1 Comparison of spray flushing system and traditional bristle brushes in flexible endoscope reprocessing
Parameter
Spray flushing system
Traditional bristle brushes
P value
Number of endoscopes3030NA
Reduction in debris46.7%73.3%P < 0.05
Channel damage (median score)44-5.25P < 0.01
ATP levels (relative light units)2632.5P > 0.05
Compatibility with Teflon tubesLess damage observedMore damage observedP < 0.01
Cleaning efficacyEffective, with room for improvementEffective, standard methodNA
Long-term durabilityPotentially longer-lasting channelsStandard durabilityFurther research needed