Functional lumen imaging probe use in a high-volume practice: Practical and technical implications

doi:10.4253/wjge.v16.i7.396

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 7

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (404)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

132

Figures (1-1)

Tables (1-5)

Sum=204

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=142

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=47

Jul 16, 2024 (publication date) through Jul 31, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2024; 16(7): 396-405
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i7.396

Table 2 Characteristics of functional lumen imaging probe procedures by sedation type, n (%)/mean ± SD

	Anesthesia 196 (51.4)	Moderate sedation 185 (48.6)
		Midazolam dose (median), 5 mg
		Fentanyl dose (median), 125 mcg
Patient age	56.6 ± 16.5	54.0 ± 16.0
Sex
Male	64 (32.7)	77 (41.6)
Female	132 (67.3)	108 (58.4)
Race
White	124 (63.3)	106 (57.3)
Black	5 (2.6)	9 (4.9)
Hispanic	22 (11.2)	16 (8.7)
Asian	20 (10.2)	25 (13.5)
Other	21 (10.7)	25 (13.5)
Unknown	4 (2.0)	4 (2.2)
Procedure indication^a
Abnormal imaging	5 (2.6)	2 (1.1)
Abnormal manometry	31 (15.8)	36 (19.5)
Achalasia	26 (13.3)	14 (7.6)
Achalasia post therapy	29 (14.8)	28 (15.1)
Dysphagia	63 (32.1)	54 (29.2)
EoE	7 (3.6)	20 (10.8)
GERD	29 (14.8)	31 (16.8)
Other	6 (3.1)	0 (0)
Patient opioid use^a	46 (23.5)	17 (9.2)
Prior foregut surgery	73 (37.2)	53 (28.7)
Procedure time (mean min)^a	21.4 ± 8.8	17.0 ± 6.4
Procedure type^a
EndoFLIP	175 (89.3)	184 (99.5)
EsoFLIP	21 (10.7)	1 (0.05)

^aP < 0.01, indicates a statistically significant difference between two groups.

EoE: Eosinophilic esophagitis; GERD: Gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Citation: Jiang Y, Vazquez-Reyes R, Kamal A, Zikos T, Triadafilopoulos G, Clarke JO. Functional lumen imaging probe use in a high-volume practice: Practical and technical implications. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(7): 396-405
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i7/396.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i7.396