Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2024; 16(3): 136-147
Published online Mar 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.136
Published online Mar 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.136
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of influential factors on underscaling
Factor | Odds ratio | 95%CI | P value |
Pathological size | 1.08 | 1.05-1.11 | < 0.001 |
Location | |||
Rectum | 1.00 | ||
Colon | 1.07 | 0.510-2.250 | 0.840 |
Localization | |||
On a flat lumen | 1.00 | ||
Over the haustra | 1.36 | 0.705-2.600 | 0.340 |
Degree of circumference | |||
< 1/3 | 1.00 | ||
≥ 1/3 | 0.65 | 0.227-1.890 | 0.290 |
Experience | |||
Less-experienced | 1.00 | ||
Experienced | 0.36 | 0.192-0.666 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Onda T, Goto O, Otsuka T, Hayasaka Y, Nakagome S, Habu T, Ishikawa Y, Kirita K, Koizumi E, Noda H, Higuchi K, Omori J, Akimoto N, Iwakiri K. Tumor size discrepancy between endoscopic and pathological evaluations in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(3): 136-147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i3/136.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.136