Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2024; 16(3): 136-147
Published online Mar 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.136
Published online Mar 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.136
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of influential factors on incorrect scaling
| Factor | Odds ratio | 95%CI | P value |
| Pathological size | 1.05 | 1.030-1.080 | < 0.001 |
| Location | |||
| Rectum | 1.00 | ||
| Colon | 1.20 | 0.612-2.360 | 0.590 |
| Localization | |||
| Over the haustra | 1.00 | ||
| On a flat lumen | 1.56 | 0.877-2.750 | 0.130 |
| Degree of circumference | |||
| < 1/3 | 1.00 | ||
| ≥ 1/3 | 1.09 | 0.414-2.870 | 0.860 |
| Experience | |||
| Less-experienced | 1.00 | ||
| Experienced | 0.44 | 0.259-0.760 | 0.003 |
- Citation: Onda T, Goto O, Otsuka T, Hayasaka Y, Nakagome S, Habu T, Ishikawa Y, Kirita K, Koizumi E, Noda H, Higuchi K, Omori J, Akimoto N, Iwakiri K. Tumor size discrepancy between endoscopic and pathological evaluations in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(3): 136-147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i3/136.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.136