Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2024; 16(3): 117-125
Published online Mar 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.117
Published online Mar 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.117
Ref. | Number of patients | Study design | Result (Diagnosis accuracy) |
Karsenti et al[68] | 60 | Randomized controlled trial | 87% with 22G needle and 67% with 20G needle for FNB, P = 0.02 |
Yousri et al[69] | 100 | Prospective study | 98% with FNA and 90% with FNB only depending on tissue |
Crinò et al[70] | 800 | Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial | 96.4% with ROSE and 97.4% without ROSE, P = 0.396 |
Facciorusso et al[71] | 2147 | Meta-analysis | FNB with ROSE group better than the FNB only group (OR = 2.49, 1.08-5.73; P = 0.03) |
- Citation: Yang X, Liu ZM, Zhou X, Yang F, Ma WZ, Sun XZ, Sun SY, Ge N. Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(3): 117-125
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i3/117.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.117