Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2024; 16(10): 545-556
Published online Oct 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.545
Published online Oct 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.545
Table 3 Comparison of treatment outcomes between the two groups
| Control group (n = 260) | Study group (n = 260) | P value | |
| Operative time (min) | 54.00 ± 9.47 | 33.49 ± 8.46 | < 0.001 |
| Length of hospital stay (d) | 5.04 ± 1.46 | 5.24 ± 1.45 | 0.117 |
| Hospitalization expenses (RMB) | 16111.40 ± 3709.71 | 14435.25 ± 3458.43 | < 0.001 |
| Materials expenses (RMB) | 4115.81 ± 1486.70 | 3571.96 ± 1507.32 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Lin XM, Peng YM, Zeng HT, Yang JX, Xu ZL. Endoscopic “calabash” ligation and resection for small gastric mesenchymal tumors. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(10): 545-556
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i10/545.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.545