Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2023; 15(5): 354-367
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.354
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.354
Table 1 Summary of studies evaluating colonic withdrawal times
Ref. | Year | Design | n | Outcome |
Barclay et al[17] | 2006 | Prospective | 7882 | WT > 6 min associated with increased ADR |
Barclay et al[18] | 2008 | Prospective | 2053 | WT ≥ 8 min associated with increased ADR |
Sawhney et al[19] | 2008 | Prospective | 23,910 | Minimum 7 min WT not associated with increased PDR |
Gellad et al[27] | 2010 | Prospective | 304 | WT ≥ 12 min not associated with risk of interval neoplasia |
Gromski et al[21] | 2012 | Prospective | 1210 | WT ≥ 10 min associated with increased ADR |
Moritz et al[24] | 2012 | Prospective | 4429 | WT ≥ 6 min not associated with increased ADR |
Lee et al[20] | 2013 | Prospective | 31088 | WT up to 10 min associated with increased ADR |
Butterly et al[28] | 2014 | Prospective | 7996 | WT ≥ 9 min associated with increased ADR |
Zhao et al[29] | 2022 | RCT | 1027 | Increased ADR associated with WT of 9 min vs WT of 6 min |
- Citation: Rajivan R, Thayalasekaran S. Improving polyp detection at colonoscopy: Non-technological techniques. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 15(5): 354-367
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v15/i5/354.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.354