Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2022; 14(3): 129-141
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i3.129
Table 2 Association between different additional performed techniques vs a positive observed agreement for malignancy diagnosis among endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-related techniques vs 24-mo follow-up [OR (95%CI; P value)]

Univariate analysis1
Multivariate analysis1
EUS alone (n = 47)0.066 (0.025-0.157; < 0.001)
EUS-FNA (n = 21)2.409 (0.905-7.182; 0.091)
CE-EUS (n = 20)1.694 (0.642-4.811; 0.298)
Cystoscopy (n = 27)4.950 (1.862-15.695; 0.003)0.622 (0.125-2.813; 0.541)
mFB (n = 36)6.625 (2.667-19.024; < 0.001)3.425 (1.104-11.682; 0.038)
nCLE (n = 44)10.489 (4.242-30.125; < 0.001)8.441 (2.698-33.081; < 0.001)

  • Citation: Robles-Medranda C, Olmos JI, Puga-Tejada M, Oleas R, Baquerizo-Burgos J, Arevalo-Mora M, Del Valle Zavala R, Nebel JA, Calle Loffredo D, Pitanga-Lukashok H. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle microforceps biopsy and needle-based confocal laser-endomicroscopy increase detection of potentially malignant pancreatic cystic lesions: A single-center study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14(3): 129-141
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v14/i3/129.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i3.129