Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2022; 14(1): 49-62
Published online Jan 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.49
Published online Jan 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.49
Table 5 Relations of complications to location or dissected size of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens, n (%)
Bleeding (+) | Bleeding (-) | Perforation (+) | Perforation (-) | Total | |
n = 6 | n = 169 | n = 2 | n = 173 | n = 175 | |
Location | |||||
Upper third | 0 | 33 (100) | 2 (6.1) | 31 (93.9) | 33 |
Middle third | 1 (1.6) | 56 (98.4) | 0 | 57 (100) | 57 |
Lower third | 5 (5.9) | 80 (94.1) | 0 | 85 (100) | 85 |
Size of specimen | |||||
≤ 20 mm | 1 (3.3) | 29 (96.7) | 0 | 30 (100) | 30 |
21-40 mm | 1 (1.0) | 102 (99.0) | 1 (1.0) | 102 (99.0) | 103 |
41-60 mm | 3 (8.1) | 34 (91.9) | 1 (2.7)1 | 36 (97.3) | 37 |
≥ 61 mm | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | 0 | 5 (100) | 5 |
- Citation: Inokuchi Y, Ishida A, Hayashi K, Kaneta Y, Watanabe H, Kano K, Furuta M, Takahashi K, Fujikawa H, Yamada T, Yamamoto K, Machida N, Ogata T, Oshima T, Maeda S. Feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years . World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14(1): 49-62
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v14/i1/49.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.49