Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2022; 14(1): 49-62
Published online Jan 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.49
Published online Jan 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.49
Table 4 Details of patients who had complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection
Age (yr) | Gender | Ps | Underlying disease | Past history | Location1 | Size (mm) | Macroscopic type | Final pathology | Curability | Specimen (mm) | Complications |
83 | F | 1 | Post-BHA | L, Ant | 40 | 0-IIc, UL (+) | Tub2 > por2, M, ly0, v0, HM0, VM0 | Noncurative | 60 | Bleeding G2 | |
83 | M | 0 | L, Ant | 10 | 0-IIc, UL (+) | Tub1 > tub2, M, ly0, v0, HM0, VM0 | Curative | 20 | Bleeding G2 | ||
92 | M | 0 | Laryngeal cancer | U, Post | 50 | Type1 | Surgical resection: pap > tub, SS, ly0, v1, NX, HMX | Noncurative | 522 | Perforation G3 | |
89 | M | 3 | Brain cancer | M, Les | 33 | 0-IIc, UL (+) | Sig/por2, M, ly0, v0, HM0, VM0 | Noncurative | 68 | Bleeding G3, pneumonitis G2 | |
83 | F | 2 | AD, Depression | U, Les | 15 | 0-IIa | Tub1, M, ly0, v0, HM0, VM0 | Curative | 30 | Perforation G2 | |
82 | F | 0 | (1) L, Ant | (1) 20 | (1) 0-IIc | (1) Tub2 > tub1 > por, M, ly0, v0, HM0, VM0 | (1) Curative | 54 | Bleeding G2 | ||
(2) L, Ant | (2)10 | (2)0-IIc | (2) Tub1-tub2, M, ly0, v0, HM0, VM0 | (2) Curative | |||||||
84 | M | 2 | AP, COPD | L, Les | 15 | 0-IIc | Por1, M, ly0, v0, HMX, VMX | Noncurative | 40 | Bleeding G2 | |
80 | M | 0 | Colon cancer, EGC | L, Les | 16 | 0-IIa+IIc, UL (+) | Tub1 > tub2 > por, M, ly0, v0, HM0, VM0 | Curative | 47 | Bleeding G2 |
- Citation: Inokuchi Y, Ishida A, Hayashi K, Kaneta Y, Watanabe H, Kano K, Furuta M, Takahashi K, Fujikawa H, Yamada T, Yamamoto K, Machida N, Ogata T, Oshima T, Maeda S. Feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years . World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14(1): 49-62
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v14/i1/49.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.49