Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2021; 13(5): 137-154
Published online May 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i5.137
Published online May 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i5.137
Ref. | Anesthetic agent used |
Majedi et al[15] | 18 mL of lidocaine 2% plus epinephrine (1:200000) plus 2 mL of sodium bicarbonate 8.4% and fentanyl 50 µg |
Sharaf et al[19] | 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivicaine and 25 µg fentanyl |
Donmez et al[11] | hyperbaric bupivicaine 16mg and fentanyl 10 micrograms |
Kalaivani et al[14] | 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivicaine and 20 µg fentanyl |
Prasad et al[17] | 15 mg of heavy bupivicaine and 25 µg fentanyl |
Ellakany et al[12] | 5 mg plain bupivicaine and 25 µg fentanyl |
Tiwari et al[20] | 12.5 mg to 17.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivicaine |
Bessa et al[5] | 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivicaine and 20 mcg fentanyl |
Ross et al[18] | 20-25 mL of lidocaine 2% |
Mehta et al[16] | 0.3 mg/kg of hyperbaric bupivicaine 0.5% |
Imbelloni et al[13] | 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivicaine and 20 µg fentanyl |
Bessa et al[21] | 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivicaine and 20 µg fentanyl |
Tzovaras et al[4] | 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivicaine, 0.25 mg morphine and 20 µg fentanyl |
- Citation: Asaad P, O’Connor A, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized evidence comparing general anesthesia vs regional anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13(5): 137-154
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v13/i5/137.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i5.137