Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2021; 13(12): 659-672
Published online Dec 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659
Published online Dec 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659
Total (n = 1815) | High volume (n = 871) | Low volume (n = 944) | P value1 | |
Global tolerance, VAS score2, median (interquartile range) | 7 (5-9) | 7 (5-9) | 7 (5-9) | 0.627 |
Incomplete preparation (< 75% of PEG assumed) | 116 (6.6) | 67 (7.9) | 49 (5.4) | 0.0323 |
Any symptom during preparation | 860 (47.4) | 369 (42.4) | 491 (52) | < 0.0013 |
Bloating | 363 (20) | 183 (21) | 180 (19.1) | 0.301 |
Nausea | 480 (26.5) | 187 (21.5) | 293 (31) | < 0.0013 |
Vomiting | 174 (9.6) | 55 (6.3) | 119 (12.6) | < 0.0013 |
Abdominal pain | 281 (15.5) | 104 (11.9) | 177 (18.8) | < 0.0013 |
- Citation: Occhipinti V, Soriani P, Bagolini F, Milani V, Rondonotti E, Annunziata ML, Cavallaro F, Vavassori S, Vecchi M, Pastorelli L, Tontini GE. Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared: A real-life single-blinded large-population study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13(12): 659-672
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v13/i12/659.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659