Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared: A real-life single-blinded large-population study

doi:10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 12

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3763)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-8) series.

Item

Count

PDF

261

WORD

HTML

1890

Figures (1-1)

221

Tables (1-8)

192

Sum=2648

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

278

Download

837

Sum=1115

Dec 16, 2021 (publication date) through Sep 4, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (4)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2021; 13(12): 659-672
Published online Dec 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659

Table 3 Clinical outcomes according to volume of bowel preparation, n (%)

Outcome	High volume (n = 871)	Low volume (n = 944)	OR (95%CI)	P value¹	Adjusted² OR (95%CI)	P value²
PDR	283 (32.5)	237 (25.1)	1.43 (1.17–1.76)	< 0.001³	1.32 (1.07–1.63)	0.011³
ADR	210 (24.1)	171 (18.1)	1.44 (1.14–1.80)	0.002³	1.29 (1.02–1.63)	0.038³
AADR	56 (6.4)	35 (3.7)	1.79 (1.16–2.75)	0.009³	1.51 (0.97–2.35)	0.069
Cancer	19 (2.2)	15 (1.6)	1.38 (0.70–2.74)	0.354
SDR	16 (1.8)	12 (1.3)	1.45 (0.68–3.09)	0.331

¹P value degrees of freedom = 1.

²Adjustment for age (as a continuous variable), sex and indications for colonoscopy; P value degrees of freedom = 7.

³Significant different.

OR: Odds ratio; PDR: Polyp detection rate; ADR: Adenoma detection rate; AADR: Advanced adenoma detection rate; SDR: Sessile lesion detection rate.

Citation: Occhipinti V, Soriani P, Bagolini F, Milani V, Rondonotti E, Annunziata ML, Cavallaro F, Vavassori S, Vecchi M, Pastorelli L, Tontini GE. Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared: A real-life single-blinded large-population study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13(12): 659-672
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v13/i12/659.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659