Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared: A real-life single-blinded large-population study

doi:10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 12

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4390)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-8) series.

Item

Count

PDF

291

WORD

HTML

2179

Figures (1-1)

279

Tables (1-8)

246

Sum=3088

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

326

Download

976

Sum=1302

Dec 16, 2021 (publication date) through Jan 10, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (4)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2021; 13(12): 659-672
Published online Dec 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659

Table 2 Clinical outcomes according to quality of preparation, n (%)

Outcome	Adequate preparation (n = 1595)	Inadequate preparation (n = 220)	OR (95%CI)	P value¹
Complete examination	1590 (99.7)	203 (92.3)	26.63 (9.72-72.96)	< 0.001²
PDR	476 (29.8)	44 (20.1)	1.69 (1.20-2.40)	0.003²
ADR	347 (21.8)	34 (15.5)	1.52 (1.04-2.23)	0.033²
AADR	82 (5.1)	9(4.1)	1.27 (0.63-2.57)	0.505
Cancer	27 (1.7)	7 (3.2)	0.52 (0.23-1.22)	0.133
SDR	26 (1.6)	2 (0.9)	1.81 (0.43-7.66)	0.423

¹P value degrees of freedom = 1.

²Significant different.

OR: Odds ratio; PDR: Polyp detection rate; ADR: Adenoma detection rate; AADR: Advanced adenoma detection rate; SDR: Sessile lesion detection rate.

Citation: Occhipinti V, Soriani P, Bagolini F, Milani V, Rondonotti E, Annunziata ML, Cavallaro F, Vavassori S, Vecchi M, Pastorelli L, Tontini GE. Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared: A real-life single-blinded large-population study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13(12): 659-672
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v13/i12/659.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.659