Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage-current status and future perspectives

Table 1 Summary of outcomes in recently published data on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography comparative analysis

Ref.	Type of evidence	Patients, n (%)	Technical success, EUS-BD–ERCP, n (%)	Clinical success, EUS-BD-ERCP, n (%)	AE, EUS-BD-ERCP, n (%)
Dhir et al[23], 2015	Multicenter retrospective analysis	208	94.23-93.26 (98/104-97/104)	N/A	8.65-8.65 (N/A)
Kawakubo et al[27], 2016	Retrospective study	82	N/A	96.2-98.2 (25/26-55/56)	26.9-35.7 (7/26-20/56)
Park et al[29], 2018	Prospective randomized controlled study	30	92.9-100.0 (13/14-14/14)	92.9-100.0 (13/14-14/14)	0.0-0.0 (0/14-0/14)
Paik et al[30], 2018	Multicenter randomized trial	125	93.8-90.2 (60/64-55/61)	84.4-85.2 (54/64-52/61)	10.9-39.3 (7/64-24/61)
Bang et al[28], 2018	Prospective randomized trial	125	90.9-94.1 (30/33-32/34)	97.0-100.0(32/33-34 /34)	21.2-14.7 (7/33-5/34)
Logiudice et al[34], 2019	Meta-analysis	222	91.96-91.81 (N/A)	84.81-85.53 (N/A)	N/A (4/79–25/76)

ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EUS-BD: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage-endoscopic.