Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2020; 12(8): 220-230
Published online Aug 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i8.220
Table 3 Factors influencing the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedural time
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Procedural time ≥ 70 min, n (yes/no)OR95%CIP valueOR95%CIP value
Age ≥ 76 yr13/92.090.63–6.940.23
Sex, male17/200.340.06–1.980.23
Period after B-II reconstruction ≥ 4011/111.00.31–3.261.0
Untreated papilla of Vater21/211.00.06–17.11.0
Antithrombotic drug use3/40.710.14–3.630.68
Periampullary diverticulum1/30.300.03–3.150.32
Bile duct stone15/160.80.22–2.940.74
Transverse diameter of largest stone ≥ 12.2 mm7/80.770.18–3.210.72
Number of stones ≥ 210/72.290.52–10.00.27
CS group17/104.081.11–5.00.0353.971.05–15.00.04
EST14/121.460.44–4.880.54
EPBD or EPLBD10/91.200.37–3.970.76
Papilla of Vater access20/191.580.24–10.50.64
Stone clearance8/81.00.24–4.21.0
Stone destruction6/32.670.52–13.70.24
Procedural success15/190.340.07–1.540.160.360.07–1.740.2

  • Citation: Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Sato Y, Irie H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Takasumi M, Hashimoto M, Kato T, Hikichi T, Ohira H. Which scope is appropriate for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after Billroth II reconstruction: An esophagogastroduodenoscope or a colonoscope? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12(8): 220-230
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v12/i8/220.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i8.220