Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2020; 12(8): 220-230
Published online Aug 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i8.220
Table 1 Comparison of patient characteristics between the esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy groups
EGDS group (n = 17)CS group (n = 27)P value
Age (yr, mean ± SD)75.2 ± 13.075.7 ± 13.00.88
Sex, male/female15/222/50.69
Period after B-II reconstruction (yr, mean ± SD)36.8 ± 13.836.8 ± 13.81.0
Diseases treated with B-II reconstruction
Gastric ulcer, n1011
Duodenal ulcer, n39
Gastric cancer, n24
Pyloric stenosis, n11
Gastric ptosis, n11
Unknown, n1
Untreated papilla of Vater, n (%)15 (88.2)27 (100)0.14
Antithrombotic drugs, n (%)2 (11.8)5 (18.5)0.69
Periampullary diverticulum, n (%)1 (5.9)3 (11.1)1.0
Disease, n
Bile duct stone11200.52
Others67
Biliary ductal cancer32
Pancreatic cancer13
Chronic pancreatitis11
Benign biliary stricture11
Transverse diameter of the largest stone (mm, mean ± SD)10.2 ± 4.812.2 ± 3.80.24
Number of stones [n, median (range)]4 (1 - 30)2 (1 - 6)0.18

  • Citation: Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Sato Y, Irie H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Takasumi M, Hashimoto M, Kato T, Hikichi T, Ohira H. Which scope is appropriate for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after Billroth II reconstruction: An esophagogastroduodenoscope or a colonoscope? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12(8): 220-230
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v12/i8/220.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i8.220