Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2020; 12(7): 198-211
Published online Jul 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i7.198
Table 3 Final multiple logistic regression analysis investigating factors associated with submucosal invasion
FactorEstimateOR95%CIP value
Age-0.01550.9850.943-1.0290.4553
Gender
Male(reference)
Female0.21961.5510.634-3.9470.3149
Size group
20 mm(reference)
21-30 mm-0.29040.8520.227-3.7530.5141
31-40 mm0.03141.0330.25-4.7660.9082
> 40 mm0.35121.5450.42-6.8130.3037
Paris classification
Paris classification 1p(reference)
Paris classification (IIa, IIa + c, IIa + Is) vs 1p-0.26080.980.279-5.1930.6221
Paris classification IIb vs 1p-2.16390.1460.001-1.9430.0406
Paris classification IIc vs 1p2.665218.2811.366-340.689aP < 0.05
Kudo Pit Pattern
Others(reference)
Pattern (IIIL + IV and V)0.76264.5961.506-12.997bP < 0.001
Morphology
Granular(reference)
Non granular-0.21780.7610.263-2.0180.5423
Mixed0.16241.1130.21-4.3360.7352
Location
Recto sigmoid(reference)
Proximal colon (Cecum- Descending Colon)-0.45550.4020.161-1.0560.0458