Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2020; 12(12): 542-554
Published online Dec 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i12.542
Table 2 Comparison of stricture outcomes in the thirty patients that returned for follow-up

CR (n = 20)
PR + NR (n = 10)
P value
Demographics
Age at AMAT [yr (IQR)]28 (24-32)26 (25-47)0.66
Sex (M)1140.70
Duration of disease [yr (IQR)]4 (1-8)2 (1-4)0.45
Time between diagnosis and stricture [yr (IQR)]3 (0-6)1.5 (0-3)0.54
Stricture outcome
Single stricture, n (%)19 (95)7 (70)0.10
Multiple strictures, n (%)1 (5)3 (30)
Clinical outcome
Clinical response, n (%)16 (80)5 (50)0.12
No clinical response, n (%)4 (20)5 (50)
Pathology
CRP [mg/L (IQR)]4 (3-10)6 (4-8)0.71
ESR [mm/h (IQR)]5 (2-9)6 (4-11)0.86
Area of involvement
ICV, n (%)8 (40)4 (40)
TI, n (%)12 (60)5 (50)
ICV + TI, n (%)0 (0)1 (10)
Duration of AMAT for stricture outcome
≤ 12 mo, n (%)10 (50)3 (30)0.44
> 12 mo, n (%)10 (50)7 (70)