Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2020; 12(11): 408-450
Published online Nov 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i11.408
Table 9 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy
Ref.
Year
Country
Study design
n
Procedure
Medication
Relative risk
Freeman et al[64]1996United States and CanadaProspective2347ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of PPB 2%
Masci et al[21]2001ItalyProspective1662ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of PPB 0.7%. Incidence of immediate PPB 1.1%
Tzovaras et al[65]2012GreeceProspective50ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of PPB 2%
Patai et al[66]2014HungaryProspective242ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of delayed PPB 6.3%. Incidence of immediate/intraprocedural bleeding 2.7%
Tanaka et al[67]2015JapanProspective360ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of PPB 9.9%
Ikarashi et al[68]2017JapanRetrospective816ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of PPB 2.2%
Bae et al[69]2019South KoreaRetrospective1121ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of delayed PPB 1.2%. Incidence of immediate/intraprocedural PPB 8.5%
Lima et al[70]2020BrazilProspective2137ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of PPB 2.2%
Yan et al[71]2020ChinaRetrospective8477ERCP + sphincterotomyNo medicationsIncidence of PPB 1.6%