Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 16, 2019; 11(6): 403-412
Published online Jun 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i6.403
Published online Jun 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i6.403
Factor | Non-cirrhotics | Cirrhotics | Statistics | P value |
Stent type | 0.14d | |||
Hot axios | 9 (36.0) | 4 (80.0) | 44.0 (-6.3, 85.3) | |
FCSEMS | 16 (64.0) | 1 (20.0) | ||
Drainage approach | 0.99d | |||
Transgastric | 24 (96.0) | 5 (100.0) | 4.0 (-45.0, 52.4) | |
Transduodenal | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Tract dilation | 16 (64.0) | 1 (20.0) | -44.0 (-85.3, 6.3) | 0.14d |
Technical Success | 25 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | - | - |
Endoscopic necrosectomy | 7 (28.0) | 2 (40.0) | 12.0 (-37.5, 60.1) | 0.62d |
Hydrogen peroxide irrigation | 14 (56.0) | 2 (40.0) | -16.0 (-64.4, 33.8) | 0.64d |
Need for concomitant percutaneous drainage | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) | -4.0 (-52.4, 45.0) | 0.99d |
- Citation: Laique S, Franco MC, Stevens T, Bhatt A, Vargo JJ, Chahal P. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections in cirrhotics vs non-cirrhotics: A comparative study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(6): 403-412
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i6/403.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i6.403