Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2019; 11(5): 365-372
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.365
Table 2 Comparison between patients who had migration of fully covered self-expanding metal stent placement (FCSEMS) and patient who had no migration of FCSEMS
CharacteristicDeterminantMigration (n = 18)No migration (n = 185)P-value
GenderFemale5 (27.8%)83 (44.9%)0.1626
Male13 (72.2%)102 (55.1%)-
Agemean ± SD (range)59.83 (12.38) - (34.00, 91.00)63.28 (15.23) - (23.00, 91.00)0.3539
RaceBlack2 (11.1%)7 (3.8%)0.1494
White16 (88.9%)178 (96.2%)-
Post sphincterotomy bleedNo17 (94.4%)177 (95.7%)0.8086
Yes1 (5.6%)8 (4.3%)-
Bile leakNo18 (100.0%)165 (89.2%)0.1418
Yes0 (0.0%)20 (10.8%)-
Benign biliary strictureNo6 (33.3%)115 (62.2%)0.0173
Yes12 (66.7%)70 (37.8%)-
Cholangitis drainageNo18 (100.0%)173 (93.5%)0.2653
Yes0 (0.0%)12 (6.5%)-
Malignant strictureNo13 (72.2%)95 (51.4%)0.0902
Yes5 (27.8%)90 (48.6%)-
Brand of FCSEMSViabil fully covered8 (44.4%)82 (44.3%)0.2294
Viabil fully covered with proximal fenestration3 (16.7%)60 (32.4%)-
WallFlex7 (38.9%)43 (23.2%)-
Length of FCSEMS (cm)42 (11.1%)28 (15.1%)0.9376
69 (50.0%)97 (52.4%)-
85 (27.8%)42 (22.7%)-
102 (11.1%)18 (9.7%)-
Anchored FCSEMSs with DPSNo14 (77.8%)124 (67.0%)0.3507
Yes4 (22.2%)61 (33.0%)-
Length of stricture (mm)mean ± SD (range)14.67 (10.72) - (0.00, 40.00)19.65 (19.32) - (0.00, 90.00)0.0958
CBD diameter (mm)mean ± SD (range)11.61 (4.50) - (5.00,22.00)11.15 (4.70) - (3.00,35.00)0.6878
History of cholecystectomyNo5 (27.8%)87 (47.0%)0.1173
Yes13 (72.2%)98 (53.0%)-
Previous sphincterotomyNo6 (33.3%)114 (61.6%)0.0198
Yes12 (66.7%)71 (38.4%)-
Sphincterotomy at time of stent deploymentNo9 (50.0%)73 (39.5%)0.3843
Yes9 (50.0%)112 (60.5%)-
History of stent migrationNo17 (94.4%)179 (96.8%)0.6078
Yes1 (5.6%)6 (3.2%)-
Choledocholithiasis at time of stent placementNo16 (88.9%)172 (93.0%)0.5272
Yes2 (11.1%)13 (7.0%)-