Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2019; 11(5): 354-364
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
ERCP | Widely available Relative low complication rate (compared to PTBD and EUS-BD) | Not feasible in case of inaccessible papilla |
PTBD | Available rescue therapy for ERCP failure | High complication rate (bleeding-infection) External catheter Contraindicated if ascites |
EUS | Different possible approaches (HGA, CDS, GBD, RV) Internal drainage Same session of failed ERCP Fewer re-interventions | Not widely available High endoscopic ERCP/EUS expertise required Not yet standardized algorithm |
- Citation: Salerno R, Davies SEC, Mezzina N, Ardizzone S. Comprehensive review on EUS-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(5): 354-364
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i5/354.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354