Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2019; 11(5): 354-364
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354
Ref. | Design | Proposed algorithm | No. of patients | Technical success rate | Complication rate |
Park et al[35] | PS | “Enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol” EUS-RV/EUS-AS with guidewire manipulation protocol as a first-line In case of failure or duodenal invasion, transmural EUS-BD | 45 | 91% | 11% |
Tyberg et al[20] | PS | “Patient anatomy” Dilated IHBT on cross-sectional imaging, received IHa Nondilated IHBT on cross-sectional imaging, received EHa In case of failure of IHa, conversion to an EHa | 52 | 96% | 10% |
- Citation: Salerno R, Davies SEC, Mezzina N, Ardizzone S. Comprehensive review on EUS-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(5): 354-364
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i5/354.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354