Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2019; 11(3): 239-248
Published online Mar 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.239
Table 2 Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for evaluating the quality of the studies
Ref.Selection
Comparability
Outcome
Points
Representativeness of the exposed cohortSelection of the unexposed cohortAscertainment of exposureDemonstration that outcome of interest was not present at the start of studyComparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysisAssessment of outcomeWas follow-up long enough for outcomes to occurAdequacy of follow-up of cohort
Li et al[10], 2015×××××××7 Points
Strauss et al[11], 2014××××××××8 Points
Haidry et al[12], 2013×××××××7 Points
Kim et al[14], 2012××××××6 Points
Caillol et al[15], 2012××××××6 Points
Okoro et al[16], 2012×××××××7 Points
Pouw et al[17], 2008××××××××8 Points

  • Citation: de Matos MV, da Ponte-Neto AM, de Moura DTH, Maahs ED, Chaves DM, Baba ER, Ide E, Sallum R, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Treatment of high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma using radiofrequency ablation or endoscopic mucosal resection + radiofrequency ablation: Meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(3): 239-248
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i3/239.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.239