Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2019; 11(10): 491-503
Published online Oct 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i10.491
Table 2 Summary of the efficacy and complications of all endoscopic therapies
TechniqueEfficacyComplications
Focal EMR and ablationCE in EAC: 96.3%[13] and ESCC: 90%[54]Major bleeding: 1.4%[13] Perforation: 0.1% Strictures: 1.3%
Stepwise radical EMRCE-N: 94.9%[42] CE-IM: 79.6%Bleeding: 1.0%[16] Perforation: 1.0% Strictures: 49.7%
ESDEn-bloc resection rate in EAC: 92.9%[18] and ESCC: 90%-100%[55-57] Complete resection rate in EAC: 74.5%[18] Curative resection rate in EAC: 64.9%[18] and ESCC: 88%-97%[55-57]Bleeding: 1.5%-1.8%[18,19] Perforation: 1.5%-4.6% Strictures: 6.5%-11.6%
STERComplete Resection rates in SMTs: 100%[24] En-bloc resection rates in SMTs: 98.6%Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum: 14.8%[24] Pleural effusion: 16.9% Pneumoperitoneum: 6.8% Pneumothorax: 6.1% Mucosal injury: 5.6%
RFACE-D: 81%[44] CE-IM: 77.4%[44] CE in ESCC: 84%[61]Strictures: 6%[25] Chest pain: 2% Bleeding: 1%
PDTDiscontinued in the United StatesPhotosensitivity reactions: 69%[25] Esophageal strictures: 36% Chest pain: 20%
CryotherapyCE-HGD: 98%[46] CE-D: 94% CE-IM: 82%Abdominal pain: 19.3%[27] Dysphagia: 10.2% Sore throat: 9% Chest pain: 8% Strictures: 0-12.5%
Hybrid-APCCE-IM:78%[28]Strictures: 2%[28]