Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2018; 10(9): 165-174
Published online Sep 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.165
Table 1 Comparing the efficacy and complication rate of various endoscopic techniques
TechniqueEfficacyComplication rate
Radiofrequency ablationCE-D: 92%-98%[15,16]Strictures: 5%-6%[26]
CE-IM: 88%-91%[15,16]Chest pain: 3.8%
Bleeding: 1%
CryotherapyCE-D: 95%[30,33]Strictures: 3%-13%[33,34]
CE-IM: 88%[30,33]Bleeding: 2%
Argon plasma coagulationCE-IM: 58%-78%[38,40]Stricture: 4%[40,47]
Bleeding: 4%
Perforation: 2%
Photodynamic therapyCE-D: 80%[50,51]Photosensitivity: 69%[57]
CE-IM: 43%-53%[50,51]Stricture: 36%[58]