Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2018; 10(9): 165-174
Published online Sep 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.165
Published online Sep 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.165
Technique | Efficacy | Complication rate |
Radiofrequency ablation | CE-D: 92%-98%[15,16] | Strictures: 5%-6%[26] |
CE-IM: 88%-91%[15,16] | Chest pain: 3.8% | |
Bleeding: 1% | ||
Cryotherapy | CE-D: 95%[30,33] | Strictures: 3%-13%[33,34] |
CE-IM: 88%[30,33] | Bleeding: 2% | |
Argon plasma coagulation | CE-IM: 58%-78%[38,40] | Stricture: 4%[40,47] |
Bleeding: 4% | ||
Perforation: 2% | ||
Photodynamic therapy | CE-D: 80%[50,51] | Photosensitivity: 69%[57] |
CE-IM: 43%-53%[50,51] | Stricture: 36%[58] |
- Citation: Singh T, Sanaka MR, Thota PN. Endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal cancer: Where do we go from here? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10(9): 165-174
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v10/i9/165.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.165