Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2018; 10(12): 400-421
Published online Dec 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i12.400
Published online Dec 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i12.400
Study | Hadithi et al, 2006[4] | Hermans et al, 2017[11] | Holleran et al, 2014[37] | Kaffes et al, 2007[34] | Kalra et al, 2015[16] | Kamalapor et al, 2008[30] | Kameda et al, 2008[27] | Li et al, 2010[35] | Lin et al, 2007[40] | Maeda et al, 2015[32] | Marmo et al, 2009[23] | TianMin, et al, 2013[39] | Nakamura et al, 2006[29] | Rahmi et al, 2013[33] | Chu et al, 2016[17] | Zhang, et al, 2015[15] |
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | YES | UNCLEAR | UNCLEAR | YES | UNCLEAR | UNCLEAR | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | UNCLEAR |
Was a case-control design avoided? | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | YES | YES | YES | YES | UNCLEAR | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO |
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? | LOW | MODERATE | HIGHT | LOW | HIGH | HIGH | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | HIGH |
Are there concerns that the included patients do not match the review question? | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | HIGH |
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | UNCLEAR | UNCLEAR | UNCLEAR | YES | NO | YES | NO | NO | UNCLEAR |
If a threshold was used, was it prespecified? Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? | YES LOW | YES MODERATE | YES LOW | YES MODERATE | NO MODERATE | YES MODERATE | YES LOW | YES MODERATE | NO MODERATE | YES MODERATE | YES LOW | NO HIGH | YES LOW | YES MODERATE | YES MODERATE | YES MODERATE |
Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from the review question? | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | HIGH |
Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | UNCLEAR |
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | UNCLEAR |
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias? | LOW | MODERATE | LOW | MODERATE | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | HIGH | HIGH |
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the review question? | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | HIGH | HIGH |
Was there an appropriate interval between index test(s) and reference standard? | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | UNCLEAR |
Did all patients receive a reference standard? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Were all patients included in the analysis? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Could the patient flow have introduced bias? | MODERATE | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | MODERATE | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | LOW | MODERATE | LOW | LOW |
- Citation: Brito HP, Ribeiro IB, de Moura DTH, Bernardo WM, Chaves DM, Kuga R, Maahs ED, Ishida RK, de Moura ETH, de Moura EGH. Video capsule endoscopy vs double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis of small bowel bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10(12): 400-421
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v10/i12/400.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i12.400